‘Lead and Support’ versus ‘Control and Command’: A Case Study of Culture Clash in a Canadian-Korean Merger 


Vol. 8,  No. 1, pp. 37-48, Jun.  2005


Link
  Abstract

Mergers and acquisitions (M&As) have been a popular strategy for organizational growth in the world of business. Despite their popularity, more than sixty percent of M&As fail. Research suggests that one of the biggest reasons for such high failure rates is the culture clash taking place during the process of organizational integration. This article examines a unique case of integrating three organizational identities into one in a cross-cultural context. Alcan Taihan Aluminum (ATA) was created when Alcan, a Canadian multinational corporation, merged with Taihan in Korea in 1999. Later on, ATA acquired Koralu, Taihan’s former competitor. The culture clash between the North American expatriates and the Korean managers and employees was characterized as a clash between two organizational cultures: ‘lead and support’ and ‘control and command.’ Alcan’s management practices were rooted in North America, reflecting its cultural orientations such as high individualism, low uncertainty avoidance, and low power distance. On the other hand, the management practices from Taihan and Koralu were rooted in Korean culture characterized by low individualism, high uncertainty avoidance, and high power distance. There were other problems that had to be overcome as well, including problems in communication caused by differences in the first language of the expatriate managers and the Korean employees. Based on interview and archival data, this research examined the effective integration strategies and practices that helped ATA overcome the cultural clash during the first three years of their operation. We also discussed the potential problems and managerial challenges that had emerged during the process of cultural integration.

  Statistics
Cumulative Counts from November, 2022
Multiple requests among the same browser session are counted as one view. If you mouse over a chart, the values of data points will be shown.


  Cite this article

[IEEE Style]

S. H. Nam and Y. W. Han, "‘Lead and Support’ versus ‘Control and Command’: A Case Study of Culture Clash in a Canadian-Korean Merger," Academia Koreana, vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 37-48, 2005. DOI: .

[ACM Style]

Sang Hoon Nam and Young Wie Han. 2005. ‘Lead and Support’ versus ‘Control and Command’: A Case Study of Culture Clash in a Canadian-Korean Merger. Academia Koreana, 8, 1, (2005), 37-48. DOI: .

[APA Style]

Nam, S. & Han, Y. (2005). ‘Lead and Support’ versus ‘Control and Command’: A Case Study of Culture Clash in a Canadian-Korean Merger. Academia Koreana, 8(1), 37-48. DOI: .

[MLA Style]

Sang Hoon Nam, and Young Wie Han. "‘Lead and Support’ versus ‘Control and Command’: A Case Study of Culture Clash in a Canadian-Korean Merger." Academia Koreana, vol. 8, no. 1, 2005, pp. 37-48. doi:

[HAVARD Style]

Sang Hoon Nam and Young Wie Han (2005) '‘Lead and Support’ versus ‘Control and Command’: A Case Study of Culture Clash in a Canadian-Korean Merger', Academia Koreana, 8(1), pp. 37-48. doi:

[ACS Style]

Nam, S.; Han, Y.. Academia Koreana 8 2005, 37-48.

[ABNT Style]

Nam, S.; Han, Y.. ‘Lead and Support’ versus ‘Control and Command’: A Case Study of Culture Clash in a Canadian-Korean Merger. Academia Koreana, v. 8, n. 1, p. 37-48, 2005. DOI:

[Chicago Style]

Sang Hoon Nam and Young Wie Han. "‘Lead and Support’ versus ‘Control and Command’: A Case Study of Culture Clash in a Canadian-Korean Merger." Academia Koreana 8, no. 1 (2005): 37-48. doi:

[TURABIAN Style]

Sang Hoon Nam and Young Wie Han. "‘Lead and Support’ versus ‘Control and Command’: A Case Study of Culture Clash in a Canadian-Korean Merger." Academia Koreana 8, no. 1 (2005): 37-48.

[VANCOUVER Style]

Sang Hoon Nam and Young Wie Han. ‘Lead and Support’ versus ‘Control and Command’: A Case Study of Culture Clash in a Canadian-Korean Merger [Academia Koreana]. 2005;8:37-48. DOI:

[Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS)]

Download

[BibTeX]

Download